| No. |
Name |
Date |
Arbitrator |
Details |
| 1 |
Allstate v. Liberty |
Aug. 29, 1995 |
Lee Samis |
"Named Insured" |
| 2 |
Allstate v. Boreal |
Oct. 6, 1995 |
Lee Samis |
"Insured Person", priority dispute |
| 3 |
Progressive v. Zurich |
Jan. 7, 1996 |
Lee Samis |
"Insured Person", dependency, priority dispute |
| 4 |
Co-Operators v. Royal |
Aug. 29, 1996 |
Lee Samis |
Occupancy, meaning of "struck", priority dispute |
| 5 |
Allstate v. State Farm |
Oct. 30, 1996 |
Jay Rudolph |
Priority dispute |
| 6 |
Dominion v. Zurich |
July 16, 1997 |
Stephen Malach |
Priority dispute |
| 7 |
Co-Operators v. Cigna |
Aug. 14, 1997 |
Lee Samis |
"Named Insured", priority dispute |
| 8 |
Dominion v. MVACF |
Nov. 10, 1997 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 9 |
The Personal v. Security National |
July 7, 1998 |
Lee Samis |
Occupancy, "Insured Person", priority dispute |
| 10 |
Co-Operators v. Zurich, with Appeal of Madam Justice Speigel dated Aug. 13, 1999, including further endorsement dated Oct. 18, 1999 |
July 27, 1998 |
Jay Rudolph |
Does death constitute a "Physical Injury"? |
| 11 |
Lloyds of London v. State Farm |
Oct. 13, 1998 |
Bruce Robinson |
"Named Insured" priority dispute |
| 12 |
Commercial Union v. Boreal Property |
Dec. 21, 1998 |
Philippa Samworth |
What is the extent of production required between two insurers in a loss transfer matter pursuant to s. 275 of the Insurance Act? |
| 13 |
GAN General Insurance v. State Farm |
Dec. 30, 1998 |
Jay Rudolph |
Loss transfer |
| 14 |
Unifund v. Commercial Union (Endorsement on Appeal) |
June 30, 1999 |
Ferrier, J. |
"Named Insured", loss transfer |
| 15 |
Federation v. Liberty |
May 7, 1999 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 16 |
Jevco v. Unifund |
July 29, 1999 |
Jay Rudolph |
Who is responsible for legal expenses of settlement? Loss transfer |
| 17 |
Guardian v. Wawanesa |
Aug. 5, 1999 |
Stephen Malach |
Was notice of dispute properly given? Was one year limitation period complied with? Priority dispute |
| 18 |
Dominion v. Kingsway |
Aug. 23, 1999 |
Lee Samis |
Fault Determination Rules, nature of "Loss Transfer", automobile "Involved" in accident |
| 19 |
Liberty Mutual v. Federation, with Judgment of Labrosse, Doherty and Austin, JJ. A. on appeal dated Apr. 10, 2000 (dismissed with costs) |
Sept. 15, 1999 |
O`Leary, J. |
Dependency |
| 20 |
State Farm v. Kingsway |
Oct. 20, 1999 |
Lee Samis |
"Regular Use", "Other Entity", priority dispute |
| 21 |
AXA v. Co-Operators, with Endorsement of Nordheimer, J. on appeal dated May 3, 2001 |
May 1, 2000 |
Jay Rudolph |
Was notice of dispute properly given? |
| 22 |
Jevco v. State Farm |
Aug. 22, 2000 |
Lee Samis |
Motion to compel non-party to examination for discovery |
| 23 |
Jevco v.State Farm |
Sept. 13, 2000 |
Lee Samis |
Motion re production |
| 24 |
Dobkina v. Commercial Union |
Sept. 27, 2000 |
William Renahan |
Assessment of Expenses and Order |
| 25 |
Pafco v. Economical and MFACF, with Endorsement of Gans, J. dated Aug. 28, 2001 on appeal (appeal dismissed), Supplementary Award-Interest of Jessee Glass dated Sept. 6, 2002, and Supplementary Award-Costs of Jessee Glass dated Sept. 6, 2002 |
Oct. 18, 2000 |
Jesse Glass |
Definition of "Insured Person", priority disupte |
| 26 |
ING Halifax v. Travellers and Great-West |
Oct. 27, 2000 |
Bruce Robinson |
Was notice of dispute properly given? Priority dispute |
| 27 |
Co-Operators v. Halifax |
Dec. 14, 2001 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 28 |
State Farm v. Lloyds of London, with Supplementary Reasons dated July 10, 2002 |
Jan. 16, 2002 |
M. Guy Jones |
Is State Farm entitled to proceed with arbitration? Priority dispute |
| 29 |
Dominion v. Wawanesa |
Sept. 17, 2004 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 30 |
Canada Life v. Progressive |
Dec. 2, 2004 |
Lee Samis |
Limitation period for bringing claim against second party insurer, loss transfer |
| 31 |
ING v. Non-Marine Underwriters, with Appeal (dismissed) dated June 21, 2005 |
Feb. 23, 2005
|
Lee Samis |
Does misrepresentation or non-disclosure defence negate loss transfer obligations? |
| 32 |
Allstate v. Allianz |
Mar. 7, 2005 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 33 |
Co-Operators v. Zurich/ING |
May 11, 2005 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 34 |
AXA v. Belair Direct |
Sept. 2005 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Physical connection to vehicle insured/element of control over vehicle, priority dispute |
| 35 |
Certas v. CGU/Aviva |
Dec. 5, 2005 |
Lee Samis |
What is effect of contractual arangements between Claimant`s father and his insurer on the availability of SABS to the Claimant? |
| 36 |
RSA v. State Farm |
Jan. 2006 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Degree of fault under Fault Determination Rules, loss transfer |
| 37 |
State Farm v. Dominion and RSA |
Jan. 2006 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Degree of fault under Fault Determination Rules, loss transfer |
| 38 |
Co-Operators v. ING |
May 2, 2006 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 39 |
Economical v. Belair |
May 2, 2006 |
Lee Samis |
Notice and whether insurance company can dispute its obligations in view of notice if given or not given, priority dispute |
| 40 |
Citadel v. Pembridge, with Costs and Interest Award dated July 4, 2006 |
May 25, 2006 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency and whether person is "Spouse" within meaning of SABS |
| 41 |
AXA v. ING |
May 25, 2006 |
Lee Samis |
"Named Insured", "Regular Use", priority dispute |
| 42 |
Gore v. Co-Operators |
Aug. 28, 2006 |
Lee Samis |
Occupancy, accident in New York, priority dispute |
| 43 |
ING v. AXA |
Oct. 31, 2006 |
James Chadwick, J. |
WSIB, heavy commercial vehicle, Schedule 1 employee, priority dispute |
| 44 |
Zurich v. Co-Operators |
Jan. 3, 2007 |
M. Guy Jones |
Reimbursement for legal expenses in defending FSCO arbitration brought by injured claimant, loss transfer |
| 45 |
MVACF v. State Farm |
Mar. 30, 2007 |
M. Guy Jones |
Stay of proceeding re whether comprehensive policy or whether it included liability and thus SABS; MVACF, priority dispute |
| 46 |
TTC v. Co-Operators |
July 23, 2007 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 47 |
Motors v. State Farm |
Oct. 2007 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Indemnification for DAC assessments and insurer exams, loss transfer |
| 48 |
Dominion v. Lombard |
Nov. 13, 2007 |
Lee Samis |
Did A give written notice to R within 90 days of receipt of Completed Application for Benefits? Priority dispute |
| 49 |
ING v. Temple |
May 7, 2008 |
Lee Samis |
Loss transfer re SPF6 coverage |
| 50 |
Security National v. Markel |
Oct. 15, 2008 |
Lee Samis |
Production privilege |
| 51 |
ING v. State Farm |
Apr. 15, 2009 |
Lee Samis |
What constitutes "Completed Application", priority dispute |
| 52 |
Gore Mutual v. Guarantee Company, with Reasons for Decision of Echlin, J. on appeal dated July 8, 2010 |
Apr. 18, 2009 |
Lee Samis |
"Named Person", priority dispute |
| 53 |
ICBC v. Federated |
July 3, 2009 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 54 |
Farmers Mutual v. Co-Operators |
July 3, 2009 |
Lee Samis |
Can one insurer put another on notice of a priority dispute more than 90 days after having received a Completed Application for Benefits? "Named Insured", spousal status, priority dispute |
| 55 |
ING v. Zurich |
July 23, 2009 |
Shari Novick |
Do loss transfer provisions apply to claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents involving pedestrians? Loss transfer |
| 56 |
Primmum v. State Farm |
Aug. 31, 2009 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency |
| 57 |
Optimum v. State Farm |
Oct. 7, 2009 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Interpretation of words "outside city, town or village" re Fault Determination Rules |
| 58 |
Kinsgway v. Gore with Reasons for Decision of Perell, J. on appeal dated Sept. 27, 2010 |
Oct. 15, 2009 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
"Named Insured", priority dispute |
| 59 |
Security National v. Markel with Reasons for Decision of Perell, J. on appeal dated Sept. 27, 2010, and companion decision (Reasons for Decision of Perell, J. re Kingsway v. Gore dated Sept. 27, 2010) |
Nov. 20, 2009 |
Lee Samis |
Occupancy, choice, "Named Insured", "Regular Use" |
| 60 |
State Farm v. Coachman |
Apr. 6, 2010 |
Lee Samis |
Priority dispute re SABS benefits payable |
| 61 |
Geico v. Aviva |
Apr. 19, 2010 |
Lee Samis |
Is a dependent of Ontario social welfare programs an "Insured Person" under the SABS? |
| 62 |
Guarantee Company v. Wawanesa and Zurich |
May 7, 2010 |
Lee Samis |
Was Claimant a dependent on the CAS? Can a person be dependent on anyone other than a natural person?
|
| 63 |
Gore Mutual v. Lombard and MVACF |
June 21, 2010 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Loss transfer - Is Gore`s purported letter of termination legally sufficient to result in a termination of Gore`s insurance obligations under the policy? |
| 64 |
Coseco v. ING |
July 21, 2010 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency status and determination of whether ING is obliged to accept priority responsibility for SABS |
| 65 |
Economical v. Kingsway |
Aug. 9, 2010 |
Scott Densem |
"Deemed named insured" priority dispute re s. 268 payment of SABS |
| 66 |
Federation v. Kingsway |
Dec. 16, 2010 |
Scott Densem |
Limitation discussion with respect to a loss transfer claim. The Limitations Act 2002 applies and the limitation starts to run with receipt of each notice of a claim for indemnity |
| 67 |
Wawanesa v. Peel |
Jan. 28, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Priority dispute - Does a second tier insurer intending to pursue other insurers have to provide notice within 90 days as the first tier insurer is required to do?
|
| 68 |
State Farm v. Markel |
Feb. 4, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Loss transfer - Is there a loss transfer when the injured person claiming benefits is a cyclist, injured in connection with an incident that involves a heavy commercial vehicle? |
| 69 |
RSA v. Zurich |
Feb. 7, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Priority dispute - Who has priority to adjust and fund the AB claim? |
| 70 |
Economical v. Wawanesa |
Feb. 8, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Complicated Priority dispute - Were policies properly cancelled prior to DOL? |
| 71 |
Security National v. Axa |
Feb. 15, 2011 |
William J. McCorriston |
Was the Claimant dependent on his son, the named insured? |
| 72 |
Ace of America v. Security National |
Mar. 11, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
90 day limitation period re priority dispute claims and the interpretation of s. 3 - Disputes Between Insurers |
| 73 |
Markel v. Co-Operators |
Mar. 31, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Obligation to make SABS payments - Are the proceedings initiated precluded as a result of not being commenced in a timely fashion? Do the time limits imposed by O. Reg. 283/95 govern the issue, or does the Limitations Act 2002 apply, superseding the O. Reg. 283/95 provisions? |
| 74 |
ING v. Markel |
Apr. 4, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Limitations Act applies to loss transfer. The limitation starts to run after notice, and after a proceeding is appropriate |
| 75 |
Kingsway v. Zurich |
Apr. 4, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
An insurer that failed to pursue priority issues against a higher ranking insurer was precluded from recovering indemnity under loss transfer |
| 76 |
Wawanesa v. Aviva and MVACF |
May 19, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
What constitutes proper notice of a priority dispute as required by Section 3(1) of Ontario Regulation 283/95? |
| 77 |
Wawanesa v. Peel and Economical |
June 21, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Did Peel receive a complete Application for Benefits? What is the effect of the saving provision found in ss. 3(2) of Ontario Reg. 283/95? |
| 78 |
AXA v. CNA |
July 22, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Loss transfer, recoverability, interest and costs |
| 79 |
Security National v. The Personal |
Aug. 9, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Priority dispute re dependency and the test to be applied |
| 80 |
Economical v. Royal |
Aug. 11, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Loss transfer – “The incident” should not take into account antecedent events that are not the proximate cause of the loss |
| 81 |
Markel v. State Farm |
Aug. 11, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Deflection and "the first party to have received a completed Application for Accident Benefits" |
| 82 |
St. Paul`s Travelers v. York Fire |
Aug. 11, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency – Selection of reference time frame for determination of financial dependency. Desirability of using objective information for the purpose of determining needs |
| 83 |
Allstate v. ING |
Aug. 18, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Dependency - Timeframe for assessment for person resident elsewhere, in MVA while visiting family in Canada |
| 84 |
ACE v. Intact |
Aug. 22, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Priority dispute - Insurer not exempted from giving notice within 90 days, not having conducted reasonable investigation |
| 85 |
TD v. Markel |
Aug. 24, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Insurer who accepted priority after receiving Notice of Dispute may reverse that position if representation made in Notice of Dispute about person`s status as not a listed driver is inaccurate |
| 86 |
Guarantee v. State Farm and ING |
Sept. 9, 2011 |
Lee Samis |
Priority dispute - “Completed Application” determined not to be one of the rare cases where there is deemed to be receipt of a “Completed Application” without a signed OCF 1 |
| 87 |
Intact v. Jevco |
Oct. 13, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Spousal issue |
| 88 |
AXA v. Loblaw |
Oct. 13, 2011 |
Kenneth Bialkowski |
Involved vehicle |